Ironman triathlete, exercise physiologist and high performance coach - I needed to talk to this guy.
The idea to write this post came to me as a result of a brief converstaion that I had with Craig at a Brother/NRG/DriverPlan team aero testing session at Derby veldrome back in June which I wrote a blog post on HERE Gettingaero I realised within a couple of minutes of meeting him that Craig was not only an extremely knowledgable guy but also very open and generous with that knowledge.
I kept in touch with Craig after our first meeting and he agreed to share some of his extensive experience on the blog. This post is based on extracts from an Email interview that I did with him recently.
Q
How big a factor in a successful IM is equipment and aerodynamics on the bike?
I
have been working with Dan at the Wattshop WattShop to get this right as when you are on
the bike for so long having the right equipment and aero position is vital to
get the best result. Small improvements of 2-3w can make minutes of
difference over the 112 miles of an Ironman distance bike leg. I think from my starting position to end position
through the process we are probably talking about 6-7minute improvement over the IM bike
course which you can look at in different ways. Either I take it as a “I can go faster”
or I go the same speed and save that 5% extra energy for the run. Training is
always going to be the biggest element but an extra 5% can't be ignored.
Q
What is the biggest mistake that you see IM and other ultra endurance athletes
making?
I
think there are possibly two things here. When athletes start on the “ultra endurance”path,
getting their fuelling and nutrition right and finding a strategy that works
for the duration of the event is something that people find hard to get right (myself
included). What sits well in a moderate to long training session doesn’t always
sit right in an ultra endurance event like Ironman. Individual experience of this is key and spending time
dialling it in is certainly time well spent.
The
second thing that really stands out is pacing, especially on hilly bike courses,
everyone seems to go crazy when climbing. In my last event I must have had at least fifty athletes pass me during the first climb. I can remember looking down at my power
meter thinking “wow, there are a lot of strong riders here” I was climbing at
4.2w/kg getting passed like I was stationary. To my relief it was just pacing
as I then passed them again later on the bike course when they had blown up.
Craig in action at Ironman Lanzarote, a tough event. I have previously blogged about my own experience of racing and training in Lanza HERE Lanza
Q
How do you ensure that your super efficient aero position on the bike doesn't
compromise your ability to run off it?
By being realistic and training as I intend to race. When racing a long distance triathlon I am not actually
as aero as possible. We worked out the aero/stack relationship which I
can then play with both in the lab (measured efficiency) and on the road for
comfort to see what is my best option. If I go 20mm lower on the front end I gain 6w @40kph aerodynamically but lose
6% efficiency on my left leg and 2% on my right, so about 8%. Although this
lower position doesn’t impact on my running directly I end
up tiring faster for the same power, meaning I hit the run more tired or have
to ride at a lower number ultimately making me slower. Once
you then have a position you feel is right do as much of your training in it to
ensure there aren’t any issues
Craig on the run at Ironman Lanzarote, here suffering on the section along Puerto Del Carmen sea front, often described as being flat the Lanza IM run is undulating and very tough.
Q
How important do you consider strength and conditioning work to be?
This
really depends on a number of factors from age, injury profile and sport to an
athletes strengths/weaknesses, time availability for training and targeted
adaptation. I suppose a very simple way of looking at it is that you only have
so much time and energy in any given week available to train so you must use this time/energy on areas that will yield the greatest
benefit to your training and development. In relation to the athletes we
work with through the performance centre OTE from beginner to world tour, I would
say about 50% of athletes do some form of specific strength training and
about 80% do conditioning work such as core/stability. It certainly has benefits
and is worth doing if you can fit it in.
Craig in his work environment coaching athletes at the OTE performance centre in Leeds OTEPerformance This is the hypoxic altitude chamber (the only commercial one in the north of England) capable of simulating an altitude of 5,750 metres and up to 30 deg C temperatures.
Q
You work at an athlete high performance centre - to what extent do you use the
facilities there to improve your own performance?
Having
full access to our testing facilities and environmental chamber enables me to
make the most of the little time I have. I usually have 8-10 hours a week for all
three disciplines which means my training has to be right. By testing regularly
I can see where the potential for improvement is and how to access it most
effectively. I can then re-test and see if everything worked as expected making
changes as I go along meaning I am probably running a full CPET (cardio pulmonary exercise test or ramp test) with blood work
every 12 weeks.
Q
What are the benefits for athletes from the use of the hypoxic chamber?
The benefits associated with this IHT (intermittent
hypoxic training) are still being researched but there have been some very positive findings so far.
Both results from our clients and the latest research shows that significant improvements
occur over sea level training which breaks down into the following points:
- Slower Fatigue- Increased resistance to intensive training helping you train and compete harder.
- Improved recovery- Both recovery rates from efforts within a session and recovery between sessions is improved reducing the chance of fatigue related injury and helping athletes stay on form.
- Increased RSA- Increased high end sprint repeatability. Studies have shown <38% greater adaptation vs sea level training.
- Increased time efficiency- As your body has to work harder in a hypoxic environment for the same effort/speed or power, a 30min IHT session can stress your cardiovascular system to the same degree as a 60min session in normoxia.
- Enhanced recovery for
injured athletes– Maintaining fitness through injury is
possible as a lower work load in hypoxia is required. Research suggests
that 35% 1RM in hypoxia yield similar benefit to 80% 1RMP in normoxia.
A social training ride from the OTE Performance Centre in Leeds - if you have any questions that you would like to ask Craig about your own training or about OTE you can contact hime HERE craig@oteperformancecentre.com
Q. As
someone who has a demanding job and a busy life - what would a 'typical'
training week look like for you as you approached an Ironman - say 4 weeks out?
That week was 15 hours, even though this was one of my biggest
weeks the focus was still heavily on speed development. A very simple way
of thinking about how to train for an ultra event is that you should be either: building the % of threshold you can sustain for a given period of time say from
68<75% by increasing training load/volume or be working on your actual
threshold pace which for me 4 weeeks out looked like this:
Monday
– Easy day; 45min open water drill based swim in the evening followed with mobility
Tuesday
AM - Interval swim session 400m warm up progressive, 8x200m efforts @
1:15/100m with a 30sec recovery. 200m cooldown
Tuesday
PM - Interval run session; Warm up then of 2 sets of 3x3min VO2 efforts (Above
5k pace) with a short 60s recovery between efforts and 3 min between sets.
Wed
AM – Steady 3k swim @ 1:28<1:30/100m
Wed
PM – Steady 2.5h bike session Z2
Thursday
– Interval run session; warm up then 5x10min ST efforts with a 2min recovery.
Friday
AM - Interval swim session 400m warm up progressive, 8x200m efforts @
1:15/100m with a 30sec recovery. 200m cooldown
Friday
PM – Interval bike session; Warm up then of 2 sets of 3x3min VO2 efforts (Above
20min TT pace) with a short 60s recovery between efforts and 3 min between
sets.
Saturday
AM - Steady 3.5k swim @ 1:28<1:30/100m
Saturday
AM – Steady 30k run using RPE 2 to guide pace within Z2
Sunday AM – 4.5h Z2 bike
with 3x20min tempo efforts at IM pace
Q Final question Craig - What do you think will be the next big thing in endurance training?
I
think the biggest development will be the emergence of smart reactive training
systems. I am a part of team that has been developing a computer system called
“Vitfor” that monitors what is going on with our athletes by analysing changes
in sleep quality (duration and actual quality), energy, fatigue (both mental
and physical), training quality and adaptation against the specific training
and racing they are doing. This is a tool that we use to aid our coaching and monitoring of athletes we work with and just last month we launched the first publicly available version which is already showing great promise.
The Vitfor system can accurately forecast where the athlete is going to be in
relation to that day/weeks performance by using both live and historical data
specific to them before recommending changes live in their program. We have now
got the system to such a level it can even write the “perfect” week from
scratch based on your availability and events in the future by taking your
entire training history and profile into account and working towards your
goals.Vitfor
No comments
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.